Skip to content
Kiran

AI/ML engineering and technical leadership

I architect production AI systems end to end.
Then I measure them honestly, even when that kills the brief.

Asked to build a model router, I measured the fleet first and found that model choice was about one percent of the bill. The other 62.9% was cache writes. The recommendation I delivered was smaller than the one I was asked for.

The recurring shape of the systems on this siteA question enters through a surface, reaches an orchestrator, which fans out to domain agents, a model tier registry and a warehouse, and returns an answer. A middleware band of guards, budgets, audit and evaluation sits under the orchestrator and governs every hop.QuestionSurfaceOrchestratorDomain agentsModel tiersWarehouseAnswerguards · budgets · audit · evaluation
This is not one project. It is the shape most of them take. Every case study below opens the real topology, with the failure paths and the load stages attached.

Selected work

9 systems, in depth

Each one is written the way I would talk through it: the problem, the constraints, the architecture, the decisions I would defend, and the things that broke.

Earlier systems, reconstructed

Designed and shipped before the work above. Rebuilt here from the résumé, and labelled as such throughout.

What I do

Four things, and what each one actually means

Pick one. Each is a claim with the systems that have to back it.

How I work

Judgement, written down where it can be checked

Technical direction, cross-functional influence, and the decisions I would defend, including the ones that made my own earlier work look worse.